Legal Opinion

Ellison v. Frigidaire Home Products

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 28, 2004No. 3833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, C.J.:

In this workers’ compensation action, AppellanNEmployer Frigidaire Home Products contends the circuit court erred in concluding an employee’s leg injury entitled him to compensation for total, permanent disability. We agree and reverse.

FACTS

While Respondent Ralph Ellison was operating a forklift for Frigidaire in November of 1999, he caught his foot in a box and fractured his leg in three places. Dr. Kirol treated Ellison for the fractures and determined that the forklift accident left Ellison with a twenty percent impairment to his left lower extremity. Dr. Kirol restricted…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stephen v. Avins Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Wigfall v. Tideland Utilities, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Singleton v. Young Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. Lyles v. Quantum Chemical Co. (Emery)Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Brown v. OWEN STEEL CO., INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ellison v. Frigidaire Home ProductsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Bartley v. Allendale County School DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  3. Bartley v. Allendale County School DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Dinkins v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API