Legal Opinion
Barbara McLaren and Vincent Tripicchio, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. The UPS Store, Inc., et al.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 20, 2025No. 1:21-cv-14424Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE BARBARA MCLAREN and VINCENT TRIPICCHIO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil No. 21-14424 (RMB/MJS) v. OPINION THE UPS STORE, INC., et al., Defendants. RENÉE MARIE BUMB, Chief United States District Judge: This case is about overcharging for notary fees. For decades, New Jersey law set the maximum fees a notary public can charge for notary services. See generally N.J. Stat. Ann. § 22A:4-14. Plaintiffs Barbara McLaren and Vincent Tripicchio claim that Defendants The UPS…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Frederico v. Home DepotCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- George Jones, Cross-Appellant v. City of Chicago, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- McTernan v. City of York, Penn.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- In Re Advanta Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.