Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Fahnestock

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1909No. 6,300PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From St. Joseph Circuit Court; Walter A. Funk, Judge. Action by Sarah M. Wilson, as executrix of the will of Carrie B. Fahnestock, deceased, against Augustus A. Fahnestock, as administrator of the estate of Camillus S. Fahnestock, deceased. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, P. J.

Appellant, as executrix of the will of Carrie B. Fahnestock, deceased, sought to recover on a judgment for alimony rendered in favor of the appellant’s testatrix and against the appellee’s intestate in the Laporte Circuit Court on October 3, 1899. A trial was had by the court, a special finding of facts and conclusions of law stated, and, over a motion for a new trial, judgment was rendered in favor of appellee.

The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first, omitting the caption, alleges, substantially, that the plaintiff was duly appointed executrix of the last will and testament of Carrie B,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Somers v. PumphreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Teegarden v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Evans v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
  4. Brown v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hamilton v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jordan v. KittleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
  2. Craig v. NorwoodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API