New Jersey Department of Labor v. Pepsi-Cola Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division allowing the Commissioner of Labor to award prejudgment interest against Pepsi-Cola Company in order to make whole the claimants who were underpaid for overtime hours worked. We do so substantially for the reasons stated in the thorough and thoughtful opinion of Judge King. New Jersey Dep’t of Labor v. Pepsi-Cola, 336 N.J.Super. 532, 765 A.2d 760 (App.Div.2001).
We reaffirm, however, that the right of the Commissioner to award prejudgment interest can arise only from his express and implied powers granted by the Legislature in enabling…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Metromedia, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Cammarata v. Essex County Park CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Matter of CVS Pharmacy WayneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Yellow Cab Co. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- In Re Regulation F-22, Office of Milk Industry, NjSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Melcar Utility Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Circus Liquors, Inc. v. Governing Body of Middletown TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Sam Hargrove v. Sleepy's, LLC (072742)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2015
- Rosen v. Smith Barney, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
- State ex rel. J.S.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.