Legal Opinion

Pinckney v. Watkinson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 24, 1962No. 50583PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarson, J.

— This action for damages followed a rear-end collision between plaintiff’s Buiek automobile, stopped to pick up two boys on old Highway 30 about three miles east of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and a Studebaker sedan owned by one defendant and operated by his 16-year-old son, the other defendant. The jury returned a verdict for defendants. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was overruled and he appealed. For convenience, we shall hereinafter refer to the son as defendant.

Appellees’ motion to strike appellant’s brief and argument for failure to comply with rule 344(4), R. C. P., and for resubmission…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ehrhardt v. Ruan Transport Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  2. Mathews v. BeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. Cunningham v. CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  4. Jesse v. Wemer and Wemer CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. Goodman v. GonseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Berghammer v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  2. Mazur v. GranthamSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  3. Oakes v. Peter Pan Bakers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  4. Robeson v. DiltsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Mathews v. BeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API