Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Clark

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 28, 1968No. Civ. 47888PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

ZIRPOLI, District Judge.

NATURE OF THE CASE

Plaintiff filed this action seeking to enjoin his then-scheduled induction into the armed forced of the United States. He alleged that he had been illegally classified and ordered to report for induction. Basically, he set forth numerous alleged procedural errors committed by his local board in the classification process which led to the order to report for induction. Said errors, plaintiff contended, denied him due process and hence vitiated the validity of the order to report for induction.

On January 23,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Frankfurter; Concurrence · Murphy.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Murray v. VaughnDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1969
  2. Marc Belding Anderson v. General Lewis B. Hershey, National Director, Selective Service SystemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  3. SCAGGS v. LARSEN, COMMANDING GENERAL, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Gabriel v. ClarkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1968
  5. Petersen v. ClarkDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API