Jackson v. Young
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Associate Judge:
In this appeal we must decide whether the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a life insurance form signed by the decedent to show his state of mind at the time of making the statement. The issue arose in connection with appellant Amaie Jackson’s effort to establish that she was the common law wife of the decedent and therefore entitled to inherit as an heir at law and to be appointed personal representative of the decedent’s estate. We hold that the insurance form was properly admitted under the state of mind exception to the hearsay rule. Accordingly, we…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Roland W. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Piper Aircraft Corporation v. Wag-Aero, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. The Southland Corporation and S. Richmond Dole and Eugene Mastropieri, the Southland Corporation, Eugene MastropieriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bowman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Bowman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994