Noble v. Murphy
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair. (Canfield, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This action was brought to recover the amount due on a promissory note, purporting to be ■signed by defendant, and payable to the order of one George Yan Wagner. The note bore date June 11, 1885, was due seven months from date, and was given for 1118, with interest.
The defendant denied the execution of the note under oath, and offered testimony tending to show that he had given a note for $18 to Yan Wagner, and that this note was given for Yan Wagner’s accommodation, and that the plaintiffs had notice that the note which he had in fact given to Yan Wagner was signed for his accommodation, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hanson v. ManleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Mathews v. SwitzlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
- Northern National Bank v. LewisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- Blair v. CarpenterMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. Detroit Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Citizens Bank v. Whinery Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- In Re Dosker's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Mid-Continent Supply Co., a Corporation v. Atkins & Potter Drilling Corp., a Corporation T. E. Atkins and W. L. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Wood v. NoyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922