Legal Opinion
Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & Development
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided January 31, 2007No. M119478, A129905PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
Petitioners seek judicial review of an order issued by respondent, the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD), opting to waive enforcement of certain land use regulations in lieu of paying compensation under ORS 197.352 (Ballot Measure 37). Petitioners have also sought judicial review in the circuit court. In response, DLCD filed a motion in this court seeking a summary determination of which court has jurisdiction to review the order. We grant the motion and determine that we have jurisdiction.
Petitioners Virginia Corey and Bergis Road, LLC, each own undivided one-third…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Bowers v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Corey v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Emmel v. Department of Land Conservation & DevelopmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Bowers v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.