Legal Opinion

Stephens v. City of Montgomery

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 1, 1991No. 89-1466PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leal Stephens filed an action against the City of Montgomery (the "City"), alleging negligent or wanton misconduct in the maintenance of a sidewalk, on which Leal allegedly fell and injured her wrist and hand; Leal's husband Robert joined her action, seeking damages for loss of companionship and wages lost while he cared for Leal's injuries. The City moved for summary judgment, which the trial court entered, because, it said, "the plaintiffs have not adduced substantial evidence of the defect that caused Leal Stephens to trip and fall." The Stephenses appeal.

In Benson v. City of Tuscumbia,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fulton v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. SHADES, ETC. v. Cobbs, Allen & Hall Mortg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Schoen v. GulledgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Woodham v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  5. Sanders v. Kirkland & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gossett v. Twin County Cable TV, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Elgin v. Alfa Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Khirieh v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Roden v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Stone v. SOUTHLAND NAT. INS. CORP.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API