Legal Opinion

Schoen v. Gulledge

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 8, 1985No. 84-249PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants on all counts stated in the complaint. The plaintiffs appeal. We reverse and remand.

Viewing the evidence most favorably to the non-moving party, which we must do in reviewing the trial court's order granting summary judgment, we find that the plaintiffs have established jury issues which compel a reversal.

Otto Schoen and his wife Clara purchased 320 acres of land in 1979. Otto Schoen approached Robert Gulledge, the record title holder, with regard to the land sometime in 1978. Gulledge quoted Schoen a price of $1,500 per acre…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Charles Townsend Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Fulton v. Advertiser Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. SHADES, ETC. v. Cobbs, Allen & Hall Mortg. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Sims v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  5. Woodham v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Berner v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. McClendon v. Mountain Top Flea MarketSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Jones v. Preuit & MauldinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. McDonald v. U.S. Die Casting and Dev.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Ex Parte BrislinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API