Legal Opinion

American Well Corp. v. Teladoc, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 13, 2016No. Civil Action No. 15-cv-12274-ITPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

TALWANI, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiff American Well Corporation (“American Well”), the owner of Patent No. 7,590,550 (“’550 patent”), alleges that Defendant Teladoc, Inc.’s (“Teladoc”) tele-health 1 system infringes on at least four of the ’550 patent’s claims. Am. Compl. [#41]. Before the court is Teladoc’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint [#42] .on the grounds that these four claims are directed to patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

American Well argues that underlying-claim construction disputes preclude this court from…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Bilski v. KapposSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Erie Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Cardionet, LLC v. Infobionic, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
  3. SmileDirectClub, LLC v. Candid Care Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API