Legal Opinion

Cardionet, LLC v. Infobionic, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 29, 2018No. 1:15-cv-11803Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CARDIONET, LLC, and BRAEMAR * MANUFACTURING, LLC, * * Plaintiffs, * * Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-11803-IT v. * * INFOBIONIC, INC., * * Defendant. * MEMORANDUM & ORDER March 29, 2018 TALWANI, D.J. This court previously allowed in part Defendant InfoBionic, Inc.’s Renewed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [#281], finding Claim 31 of

U.S. Patent No. 7,212,850

(“’850 Patent”) and Claim 12 of U.S. Patent 7,907,996 (“’996 Patent”) not patent eligible as a matter of law under Section 101 of the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 101. Mem. & Order [#289].…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Content Extraction & Transmission LLC v. Wells Fargo BankCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API