Legal Opinion

State v. . Gant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 27, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a summary remedy on official bonds, instituted by plaintiffs against M. W. Gant, clerk of the Superior Court of Guilford County, N.C. and his bondsmen, AEtna Casualty and Surety Company, defendants, under C. S., 356.

Notice was duly given defendants, in accordance with the statute, and complaint filed against them alleging that M. W. Gant, on 22 March, 1913, was duly appointed clerk of the Superior Court of Guilford County, N.C. and on assuming the duties of the office (1) executed a bond on 22 March, 1913, in the sum of $12,500 with a bonding company as surety, known as the AEtna…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bailey v. GloverSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Babbitt v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States v. HodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. United States v. TingeySupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  5. Waugh v. Guthrie Gas, Light, Fuel & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Johnson v. TaylorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1947
  3. Cheshire v. First Presbyterian Church of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. State Ex Rel. Underwood v. WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. In re GantDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API