Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Thomas L. Hudspeth

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 28, 1994No. 93-1352Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge, with whom POSNER, Chief Judge, and FAIRCHILD, FLAUM, and ROVNER, Circuit Judges, join,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Thomas L. Hudspeth and several others broke into a shopping mall and, in thirty-six minutes’ time, burglarized three stores. A bobtailed1 en banc court holds that those thirty-six minutes qualify him as a career criminal. Because I believe that this holding is contrary to the intent of the Congress and constitutes a significant departure from the approach this court has taken in previous eases, I respectfully dissent.

I

BACKGROUND

A person who has…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API