Legal Opinion
Baker v. Tomkins Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided October 7, 2004No. CIV.A. 03-2434-KHVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Carolyn Baker brings suit against Tom-kins Industries, Inc. (“Tomkins”) and Ruskin Health Care Plan (“the Plan”), alleging that they violated 29 U.S.C. § 1133 of the Employee Retirement Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), based on their denial of health insurance benefits for a cochlear implant. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants Tomkins Industries, Inc. And Ruskin Health Care Plan’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 34) and Plaintiff Carolyn Baker’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 37), both filed July 2, 2004, and Defendants Tom-kins…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Dan M.. Sandoval v. Aetna Life And Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Christine M. Donato v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kansas, University of Kansas Hospital Authority v. TitusDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
- Meyer v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
- Niedermaier v. Southern Tier Building Trades Benefit PlanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014