Legal Opinion

Bunkowske v. Briard

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1990No. C8-90-894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

In a negligence and breach of warranty action arising from the sale of allegedly infected pigs, the trial court treated a summary judgment motion against the buyers as unopposed. The court concluded that the buyers failed to submit a memorandum of law, statement of the case, or affidavits opposing the seller’s third motion for summary judgment. Because the buyers had previously submitted memoranda and affidavits which were on file with the court, and submitted additional materials in connection with a contemporaneous motion to amend their complaint, we reverse the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Rosewood Mortgage Corp. v. HeftyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Burner Service & Combustion Controls Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Nowicki v. Benson PropertiesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API