Legal Opinion

Charles Pollock, Jr. v. Eric Rardin

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 27, 2025No. 2:24-cv-12731Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CHARLES POLLOCK, Jr., 2:24-CV-12731-TGB-APP Petitioner, HON. TERRENCE G. BERG vs. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ERIC RARDIN, (ECF NO. 12) Respondent. AND MOTIONS FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE (ECF NOS. 11 & 13) Charles Pollock, Jr. (“Petitioner”) filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, which was dismissed without prejudice, because Petitioner failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and failed to show that it would be futile to do so. Pollock v. Rardin, No.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. GenCorp, Inc. v. American International UnderwritersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Melissa Brumley v. United Parcel Serv.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. Jackie Davis, by Next Friend, Edward Davis v. Jellico Community Hospital Inc. William Stafford, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Zucker v. City of Farmington HillsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API