In Re the Marriage of Traster

I agree with the majority’s well-reasoned opinion up to the point where it finds that remand is necessary for a determination of whether the Tras-ters’ agreement was just and equitable. I would find, as did the Court of Appeals, that the agreement is valid and enforceable. Specifically, the Court of Appeals found:

“[T]he parties had been married approximately 28 years. Although property division under the agreement was not an even split, the agreement explained that Debra would receive a substantial portion of the parties’ assets in the event of a *113voluntary dissolution of the marriage because…