Legal Opinion

Momar, Inc. v. Schneider

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 21, 2001No. 2000046PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

On May 16, 2000, Momar, Inc. ("Momar"), sued Sam Schneider, alleging that Schneider, a former employee, breached a noncompetition and nonsolicitation agreement contained in an employment contract between the parties. Momar sought a judgment declaring that Schneider had violated the provisions of the employment contract, and sought to have Schneider preliminarily and permanently enjoined from further violating the provisions of the employment agreement. Momar also…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rudd v. RuddCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. Perley v. Tapscan, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  3. Malone v. GaineyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. Benetton Services Corp. v. Benedot, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Jefferson County Commission v. ECO Preservation Services, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Troutman Sanders, LLPSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Burgess v. BurgessCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  3. Ex parte C.L.J.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  4. James River Corp. v. BoltonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. D.F.H. v. J.D.G.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API