Legal Opinion

Acme, Inc. v. Besson

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 12, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAKE, District Judge.

The major issue involved in this suit bears upon the constitutionality of the “National Industrial Recovery Act” approved June 16, 1933 (48 Stat. 195). The cause had been fully presented, oral arguments heard, and briefs submitted, and we were engaged in drafting an opinion in which we were analyzing the cases bearing upon the constitutional limitations placed upon the Congress in attempting to regulate the incidents to manufacture, carried on, of course, wholly within the state. In this posture, Judge Nields, a District Judge in this circuit, handed down his opinion in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bloomgarden v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Bloomgarden v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API