Legal Opinion

Miller v. Indiana Hospital

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 19, 1991No. 90-3331PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALITO, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the question whether the doctrine of state-action antitrust immunity recognized in Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341, 63 S.Ct. 307, 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943), applies to a Pennsylvania hospital’s denial of physician staff privileges pursuant to its peer review procedures. The district court held that the hospital’s conduct was immune. Because it has not been established that Pennsylvania actively supervises such peer review decisions, we will reverse.

I

Dr. Ralph J. Miller, a licensed physician and surgeon, established a practice in Indiana,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Patrick v. BurgetSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. Indiana HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Miller v. Indiana HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API