Stern v. Carlin Communications, Inc.

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about May 3, 1994, which, in enforcement proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 52, granted defendants’ motion to quash subpoena duces tecum served on respondent Chew, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion to control and regulate enforcement procedures under CPLR article 52 (see, Guardian Loan Co. v Early, 47 NY2d 515, 519), in quashing the subject subpoena, relegating plaintiff instead to the pre*111trial disclosure devices available to him in a related pending action to set aside…