Legal Opinion
In re Grotto
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 5, 2012Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Lucy Billings, J.
Petitioner Mimi Grotto, a Connecticut resident employed in New York, seeks to quash or stay enforcement of a subpoena (CPLR 3119 [e]) issued and served on her by respondent pursuant to CPLR 3119 (b) and (c), the procedures for interstate disclosure effective January 1, 2011. CPLR 3119 (e) requires that a petition or motion to quash or stay a subpoena under section 3119 comply with New York statutes and regulations. (Matter of New York Counsel for State of Cal. Franchise Tax Bd. [U.S. Philips Corp.-Haken-Tamoshunas], 33 Misc 3d 500, 506-507 [Sup Ct,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Estate of LupoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Cornell Federal Credit Union v. ThorpeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re Out-of-State Subpoenas Issued by the New York Counsel for State of California Franchise Tax BoardNew York Supreme Court · 2011
- Stern v. Carlin Communications, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Buckeye Retirement Co. v. QuattrocchiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007