M.T. Deaton & Co. v. Leibroce
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge,
Pro Tem.
This is an appeal by clients of an accounting firm from a judgment entered against them for collection of fees. The sole issue is whether the evidence provided sufficient proof of accounts stated to support the judgment. We affirm.
M.T. Deaton & Company (Deaton), an accounting firm, provided services for now defunct H & Y Engineering, Inc. P.A. (H & V) and for its successor corporation, Engineers/Surveyors Group, Inc. P.A. (the Group). Frank Leibrock and Danny Fouladpour are assignees of some of H & V’s liabilities, and are officers of the Group.
Deaton sued for collection…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Smith v. MaldonadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
- Kipp v. McBeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Bunnell & Eno Investment Co. v. CurtisIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Master Records, Inc. v. BackmanArizona Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cook v. Skyline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Youngblood v. HigbeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Gillespie v. Mountain Park Estates, L.L.C.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Christensen v. RiceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
- Cafferty v. State, Dept. of Transp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.