Legal Opinion

M.T. Deaton & Co. v. Leibroce

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 1988No. 16819PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge,

Pro Tem.

This is an appeal by clients of an accounting firm from a judgment entered against them for collection of fees. The sole issue is whether the evidence provided sufficient proof of accounts stated to support the judgment. We affirm.

M.T. Deaton & Company (Deaton), an accounting firm, provided services for now defunct H & Y Engineering, Inc. P.A. (H & V) and for its successor corporation, Engineers/Surveyors Group, Inc. P.A. (the Group). Frank Leibrock and Danny Fouladpour are assignees of some of H & V’s liabilities, and are officers of the Group.

Deaton sued for collection…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. MaldonadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Kipp v. McBeeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bunnell & Eno Investment Co. v. CurtisIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Master Records, Inc. v. BackmanArizona Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cook v. Skyline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Youngblood v. HigbeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Gillespie v. Mountain Park Estates, L.L.C.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Christensen v. RiceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Cafferty v. State, Dept. of Transp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API