Philleo v. McMurry

Reese, Ch. J.

This was an action of replevin instituted by defendant, in error against plaintiff in error for the possession of a stock of hardware and for damages in the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25.00).

The case was commenced in the county court, and appealed to the district court. The return of the constable to the summons was as follows:

“Received this writ, and on the same day I took the goods and chattels within described and have caused them to be valued by the oath of A. Bigelow and M. N. Cress, two responsible persons, whose valuation in writing and signed by them is herewith…