Legal Opinion

State v. Cengiz

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 1, 1990PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

241 N.J. Super. 482 (1990)

575 A.2d 504

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

YUCEL CENGIZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued February 28, 1990.

Decided June 1, 1990.

Before Judges SHEBELL, BAIME and KEEFE.

Robert Leotti argued the cause for appellant (A.J. Fusco, Jr., attorney; Joseph A. Ferrante, on the brief).

Kathleen P. Holly, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Nicholas L. Bissell, Jr., Somerset County Prosecutor, attorney; Kathleen P. Holly, on the letter brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, J.A.D.,…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  4. State v. FritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  5. State v. RothSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. GonzalezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  2. State v. AlvarezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  3. State v. LagaresNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  4. State v. WearingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  5. State v. JimenezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API