Legal Opinion
United States v. City of Arcata
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 17, 2010No. 09-16780PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNELLY, District Judge:
Two local ordinances, the Areata Youth Protection Act and the Eureka Youth Protection Act, prohibit agents or employees of the federal government from engaging in military recruitment activities targeting minors. The United States sued to bar enforcement of the ordinances. The district court granted the government’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and permanently enjoined the cities of Areata and Eureka from enforcing the ordinances. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
I. Facts and Procedural History
The cities of Areata and Eureka (“the cities”) are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Comite De Jornaleros De Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- The Boeing Company v. Maziar MovassaghiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Comite De Jornaleros De Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. BrnovichDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2016
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.