Legal Opinion

In re Fisher

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 13, 1971No. 8454PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRich, Judge

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 9, 11, 12, 14, 17, 29, and 30, all remaining claims in appellant’s application serial No. 363,561, filed April 29,1964, for a “Vibratory Motor.” We reverse.

THE INVENTION

The invention relates to the kind of vibratory motor used in hand-held massagers, sanders, clippers, and the like. Appellant claims a motor which employs conventional alternating “house” current to impart vibratory motion to the spring-mounted armature of an E-shaped electromagnet. This vibrating armature may be…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Hardin Y. FisherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. In re FisherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. In re CollinsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API