Alexander v. Mount
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Fayette Court of Common Pleas*
1Per curiam
Suit to recover from the stakeholder money bet upon an election.
Answer, that it had not been demanded before suit. As the suit was commenced before a justice of the peace, no reply was necessary to form an issue for trial. 2 R. S. p„. 458, § 37. There was judgment for the defendant.
It is held in New York that a party to a bet cannot re*162cover from the stakeholder the amount staked, unless he notify him not to pay it over before the contingency has happened on which its payment depended. Fowler v. Van Surdam, 1 Denio, 557. But the great weight of authority is, that it may be recovered if the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fowler v. Van SurdamCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- M'Hatton v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
- M'Gillicuddy v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1839
3Cited by2 opinions
- Taylor v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Schlosser v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1884