Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Mount

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1858PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Fayette Court of Common Pleas*

1Per curiam

Suit to recover from the stakeholder money bet upon an election.

Answer, that it had not been demanded before suit. As the suit was commenced before a justice of the peace, no reply was necessary to form an issue for trial. 2 R. S. p„. 458, § 37. There was judgment for the defendant.

It is held in New York that a party to a bet cannot re*162cover from the stakeholder the amount staked, unless he notify him not to pay it over before the contingency has happened on which its payment depended. Fowler v. Van Surdam, 1 Denio, 557. But the great weight of authority is, that it may be recovered if the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Van SurdamCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  2. M'Hatton v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1835
  3. M'Gillicuddy v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1839

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Schlosser v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API