Legal Opinion

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Star Pub. Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 20, 1924No. 427PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The issue here, telephone rates, has been before the court in several relations. P. T. & T. Co. v. Dept. of Pub. Wks., — F.(2d) —; 2 Id., 265 U. S. 196, 44 S. Ct. 553, 68 L. Ed. 975; and State ex rel. Seattle v. Dept. of Pub. Wks. et al., — F.(2d) —, 2 decision filed Sept. 25, 1924. It is contended that the restraining order should not issue because violative of section 720, R. S. (Comp. St. § 1242). If this proceeding is ancillary to the case, supra, now pending in this court, the defendant may be enjoined. Traction Co. v. Mining Co., 196 U. S. 239, 25 S.…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Genecov v. WineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. VanLeeuwen v. Farm Credit AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1984
  3. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. AgnewDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API