Legal Opinion

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Agnew

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 20, 1924No. 425PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). If the steps to make the injunctive order effective were taken, then upon the authority of Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Star Publishing Co., 2 F.(2d) 151, decision just filed, the injunctive order must issue. If, on the other hand, the effective steps were not taken and the rates under the old schedule were effective, then the relief here sought must be denied.

This court is now concerned only with the rate status of the parties from the date that the injunctive order of July 23, 1924, became effective. The order is: “ * * * From attempting to interfere with, or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Charroin v. Romort Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1916
  3. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Star Pub. Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. (PC) Perryman v. California Superior Court, County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API