Legal Opinion

Frank Bird Transfer Co. v. Krug

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1902No. 4,234PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Marion Circuit Court; H. G. Allen, Judge. Action by Mary A. Krug against the Frank Bird Transfer Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.

Action for damages for personal injuries. The complaint, which is in two paragraphs, alleges that while appellee was riding as a passenger in a carriage of appellant transfer company, she was injured by a collision between the carriage' and a car of the street railway company. Both companies are charged with negligence. The paragraphs do not materially differ. More particularly stated, the averments are, in substance, that in February, 1900, appellee engaged the appellant the Frank Bird Transfer Company, which was a common carrier of passengers for hire, to carry her from her residence in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. ShackletIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Cuddy v. HornMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. SpilkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Southern Indiana Railway Co. v. PeytonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of East Chicago v. GilbertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Indiana Union Traction Co. v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Jackson Hill Coal & Coke Co. v. BalesIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Louisville & Northern Railway & Lighting Co. v. HynesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Kingan & Co. v. AlbinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API