Legal Opinion

State v. Chesnel

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 2, 2011No. Docket: Pen-10-535PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

[¶ 1] Terry W. Chesnel appeals from a judgment entered in the Unified Criminal Docket (Bangor, R. Murray, J.) denying his motion, filed more than two years after his criminal convictions, to modify the conditions governing the collection of his court fines while he is in prison. Chesnel argues that the court erred in determining that the Department of Corrections was authorized to collect twenty-five percent of all funds deposited into his prison account for payment of court-ordered fines while he is in prison. See 17-A M.R.S. § 1330(2), (3) (2010). Because Chesnel did not raise this issue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BlakesleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  2. State v. LOI NGOSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  3. Raynes v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Francis Livingood, Christoper Maury, and Daniel Robbins v. City of Des Moines, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2023
  2. HAJI-HASSAN v. BEALDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
  3. HAJI-HASSAN v. BEALDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024
  4. PACHECO v. MAINE STATE PRISONDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API