Legal Opinion

Hart v. Hart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, James C. Hart and others, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Westchester on the 15th day of October, 1902, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the Westchester Special Term, directing a sale in partition.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

= This is an action for partition. October 21, 1901, Jessie B. Crawford, in an action for partition of the same premises, served a .summons on James C. Hart and ¡Nellie" Hart at Saratoga Springs, .and on October 22d she similarly served Eunice Hart at Ballston • Spa, and attempted. but failed to serve Charles C. .Hart, the sole "remaining defendant. On October 23, 1901, the summons served "on Eunice Hart was sent through the mails by a sister of Frances Hart to Frances, who received it on that day. On October 23d Frances Hart handed the summons to an attorney at law, and on that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shaw v. . CockNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Porter v. . KingsburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. D. G. Burton Co. v. CowanNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Warner v. WarnerNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Middlebrook v. TravisNew York Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of CohenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. Nosrep Corp. v. Clinton Securities Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. In re the Estate of DoetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  4. Doerfler v. . PottbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Doerfler v. PottbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API