Legal Opinion
State v. Detweiler
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1996No. S-95-420, S-95-503, S-95-585, S-95-520PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Randy R. and Lucinda H. Detweiler were convicted in a bench trial of manufacturing a controlled substance and possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. In addition, they were each charged with failure to affix a drug tax stamp. The record demonstrates that the district court dismissed this charge against Randy, but the record is silent as to the charge against Lucinda. Randy and Lucinda appeal their convictions, which appeals were docketed as Nos. S-95-420 and S-95-520 respectively. The State appeals the dismissal of the drug tax stamp charge against Randy,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Dennis v. PoppelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- State v. OrtizNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. McBrideNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. FaberNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.