Legal Opinion

Collins v. Barding

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1877PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Cedar Circuit Court.—IIon. John D. Parkinson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, C. J.

Action on promissory notes, the questions in the case all concerning the pleas of payment and of the statute of limitations. It is impossible lor us to notice the alleged errors, as the motion for a new trial has not been incorporated in the bill of exceptions. Mere ref*497erence to the page of the transcript will not answer. Motions must be incorporated in the bill in order to be regarded by ns—(Pacific R. R. Co. v. Opel, decided at last term). As there is no error in the record proper, the judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Affirmed.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bevin v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. McNeil v. Home InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Robinson v. HoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  4. Holt v. SimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. McKee v. CalvertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API