Legal Opinion

Holt v. Simmons

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Application for certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, P. J.

The appellant suggests that the record of this cause is diminished, in that certain orders- of continuance of his motion for a new trial, from the June to the October term and from the October to the December term, 1882, of the circuit court, were in fact made, and yet do not appear in the transcript. No sort of reference to such orders, or either of them, occurs in the bill of exceptions.

It is a well established rule, that the original bill of exceptions can not be amended by means of any proceeding in the appellate court. Its only authentication is the signature of the trial judge, and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jefferson City v. OpelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  2. Priest v. WaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  3. Corby v. TracySupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  4. Stevenson v. Saline CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  5. Robinson v. HoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hill v. CombsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Crossland v. AdmireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Rhorer v. BrockhageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Scott v. American Zinc, Lead & Smelting Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Estate of Pound v. CassityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API