Legal Opinion

Mandolfo v. Chudy

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1997No. A-96-557PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Severs, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether the plaintiffs-appellees, Joseph Mandolfo and Nancy Mandolfo, two of six coguarantors of a $325,000 promissory note, having received an assignment of said note and its guaranties, may recover the entire principal sum and accrued interest from the defendant-appellant, John P. Chudy, also a coguarantor, or is the Mandolfos’ recovery from Chudy limited to Chudy’s one-sixth pro rata share of the principal and interest due on the note. In short, does the doctrine of equitable contribution limit the Mandolfos’ recovery.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In August…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. First Security Bank of Utah N.A. v. Banberry Development Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Security Investment Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Exchange Elevator Co. v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Muller v. Tri-State Ins. Co. of MinnesotaNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Sayer v. BowleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Folgers Architects Ltd. v. KernsNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Mandolfo v. ChudyNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Albrecht v. WalterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Pirani v. Baharia (In Re Pirani)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  5. Good Gateway, LLC v. NRCT, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API