Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Crawford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1985No. 50870-4Published

1Opinion of the Court

104 Wn.2d 241 (1985)

704 P.2d 1181

DONALD T. BAUMAN, Petitioner,

v.

ROBERT S. CRAWFORD, Respondent.

No. 50870-4.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

August 8, 1985.

Miracle, Pruzan, Morrow, Pruzan & Johnson and Howard R. Pruzan, for petitioner.

Helsell, Fetterman, Martin, Todd & Hokanson, by Lish Whitson, for respondent.

PEARSON, J.

This appeal requires us to decide whether the negligence per se doctrine should be applicable to minors, or whether minors should instead be judged only by the special child's standard of care in a civil negligence action. We hold that a minor's violation of a statute…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Rosenau Ex Rel. Rosenau v. City of EsthervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  2. Braitman v. Overlook Terrace Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. Young v. Caravan CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Distad v. CubinWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Burlie v. StephensWashington Supreme Court · 1920

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API