State v. Buser
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
This is a criminal appeal in which the defendant is represented by Meryl Carver-Allmond, an attorney in the Capital Appellate Defender’s Office. This particular matter comes before the court on her Motion to Find Mandatory Application of K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 20-3301 Unconstitutional. The State filed no response to the motion.
Generally speaking, K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 20-3301 imposes deadlines for all state court decisions. In the context of this case, the statute’s first step is to direct all counsel after those deadlines have run to submit a joint request to the Supreme Court that a decision be…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Constitutional Prohibitory AmendmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- State v. BuserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017