Legal Opinion

State v. Buser

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 1, 2015No. 105,982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This is a criminal appeal in which the defendant is represented by Meryl Carver-Allmond, an attorney in the Capital Appellate Defender’s Office. This particular matter comes before the court on her Motion to Find Mandatory Application of K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 20-3301 Unconstitutional. The State filed no response to the motion.

Generally speaking, K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 20-3301 imposes deadlines for all state court decisions. In the context of this case, the statute’s first step is to direct all counsel after those deadlines have run to submit a joint request to the Supreme Court that a decision be…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  4. Constitutional Prohibitory AmendmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Powell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  3. State v. BuserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API