Legal Opinion

State v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 2017No. 107786Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 107,786 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DJUAN R. RICHARDSON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT Non-sex offenders seeking to avoid retroactive application of provisions of the Kansas Offender Registration Act (KORA) must, in order to satisfy the "effects" prong of the test set forth in Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez, 372 U.S. 144, 168-69, 83 S. Ct. 554,

9 L. Ed. 2d 644

(1963), produce a record that distinguishes—by the "clearest proof"— KORA's effect on those classes of offenders from the Act's effects on sex offenders as a class. Review of the judgment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. State v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  4. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. State v. Petersen-BeardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API