Center for Science in the Public Interest v. Department of the Treasury
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge WALD.
WALD, Chief Judge:
For more than a decade, the Center for Science in the Public Interest (“CSPI”) and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (“BATF”) have been sparring over the need to disclose ingredients on the labels of alcoholic beverages. BATF finally adopted an ingredient disclosure rule in 1980, but rescinded it in 1981; the recission was reversed by the District Court in 1983 but, after a round of legal maneuvers, BATF substantially rescinded the rule again later that year. Although we reject several of BATF’s stated reasons for the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Raymond J. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Federal Election Commission v. Congressman Charles G. RoseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- MCI Worldcom, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Center for Science in the Public Interest v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southern California Gas Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Southwest Gas Corporation, City of Mesa, Arizona, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Fina Oil and Chemical Company, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Phelps Dodge Corp., Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Intervenors. Asarco, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Phelps Dodge Corp., Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, City of Mesa, Arizona, Southwest Gas Corporation, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Fina Oil and Chemical Company, Arizona Public Service Company, Intervenors. El Paso Natural Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Southern California Gas Company, Arizona Public Service Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Southwest Gas Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, City of Mesa, Arizona, Phelps Dodge Corp., Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Intervenors. Fina Oil and Chemical Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Phelps Dodge Corp., Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, City of Mesa, Arizona, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. DoleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.