Legal Opinion
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southern California Gas Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Southwest Gas Corporation, City of Mesa, Arizona, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Fina Oil and Chemical Company, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Phelps Dodge Corp., Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Intervenors. Asarco, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Phelps Dodge Corp., Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, City of Mesa, Arizona, Southwest Gas Corporation, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Fina Oil and Chemical Company, Arizona Public Service Company, Intervenors. El Paso Natural Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, Southern California Gas Company, Arizona Public Service Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Southwest Gas Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, City of Mesa, Arizona, Phelps Dodge Corp., Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Intervenors. Fina Oil and Chemical Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Phelps Dodge Corp., Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, City of Mesa, Arizona, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 1, 1987No. 86-1078PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
817 F.2d 858
260 U.S.App.D.C. 135
PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,
Southern California Gas Company, Pacific Gas & Electric
Company, Southwest Gas Corporation, City of Mesa, Arizona,
El Paso Natural Gas Company, Fina Oil and Chemical Company,
Transwestern Pipeline Company, Phelps Dodge Corp., Salt
River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District,
Intervenors.
ASARCO, INC., et al., Petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power
District,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Raymond J. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Federal Election Commission v. Congressman Charles G. RoseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Public Utilities Commission of the State of California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southwest Gas Corporation, El Paso Municipal Customer Group, Southern California Gas Company, Conoco, Incorporated, Arizona Public Service Company, Gas Company of New Mexico, Southern Union Gas Company, El Paso Natural Gas Company, Intervenors. El Paso Natural Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southwest Gas Corporation, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, El Paso Municipal Customer Group, Southern California Gas Company, Conoco, Incorporated, Arizona Public Service Company, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Gas Company of New Mexico, Southern Union Gas Company, El Paso Natural Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990