Legal Opinion
Dayoub v. Penn-Del Directory Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 11, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-3745PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
REED, District Judge.
Plaintiff James R. Dayoub (“Dayoub”) brought this lawsuit alleging that he is disabled and that his employer failed to accommodate his disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (“ADA”). Presently before the Court is the motion of the defendant Penn-Del Directory Company (“Penn-Del”) for summary judgment (Document No. 12), the response of Dayoub thereto as well as the reply and sur-reply of the parties. Jurisdiction is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Based upon the following analysis the motion will be denied.
I.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Krouse v. American Sterilizer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Fireman's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey v. Raymond DufresneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Dennis E. Gaul v. Lucent Technologies Inc. John Does 1-100 Jane Does 1-100 Abc Corp. Xyz CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lincoln v. Momentum Systems Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Hartman v. Graham Packaging Company, L.P.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022