Legal Opinion
Bank of America, NA v. Kabba
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 6, 2012No. 109,660PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCombs, J.
FACTUAL AND PROCURAL HISTORY
1 In a petition filed on March 11, 2010, Bank of America, NA, claiming to be the present holder of the note (hereinafter Bank of America) initiated a foreclosure action against Kabba and his wife. Bank of America claimed, at that time, to hold the note and mortgage as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee under the Trust agreement for the Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust Series 2004-BNC2,. A review of the note shows a blank indorsement. This blank indorsement was filed with the lower court for the first time in the motion for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Veal v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (In Re Veal)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. JohnstonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Beneficial New Mexico Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- Bank of America, N.A. v. MoodyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. MURZELLOCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- ONEWEST BANK, F.S.B. v. JACOBSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.