Legal Opinion
Coleman Capital Corp. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 18, 1967No. 67 Civ. 1400PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HERLANDS, District Judge:
This motion by Trans Urban Construction Co., Inc. for intervention as of right pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(a) (2) is hereby granted.
The action herein was commenced by Coleman Capital Corporation, as assignee of the claims of G.B.S. Construction Corporation, the alleged subcontractor (hereinafter “G.B.S.”), and of the claims of certain laborers, against Fidelity and Deposit Company, surety on a payment bond. The bond had been furnished by Trans Urban Construction Co., Inc., the petitioner herein, as general contractor on a construction project. Petitioner had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Union Paving Company v. Downer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Ettlinger v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- United States Ex Rel. Foster Wheeler Corp. v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Revere Copper and Brass Incorporated v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and Third-Party v. George A. Fuller Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- United States Ex Rel. MPA Construction, Inc. v. XL Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Pacific Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
- Union Switch & Signal, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- In Re RJR Nabisco, Inc. Shareholders Lit.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.