Legal Opinion

Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. Higgins

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1898No. 18,433PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Boone Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This action was brought by appellee against appellant to enforce the payment of a judgment alleged to have been rendered by a justice of the peace against the Midland Railway, to whose rights and liabilities appellant has succeeded. Judgment was rendered against appellant. The court overruled a demurrer to the complaint for want of facts and for “defect of parties defendant in this: that George L.

Weitzel should have been made a defendant in said action,” and this ruling is assigned as error.

It is first insisted by appellant that the complaint was insufficient because there are no averments…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hopper v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Lapping v. DuffyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Kelley v. LoveIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Nelson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Crake v. CrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hardin v. HardinIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. McCardle v. Aultman Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Tornquist v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API