Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co. v. Frye Bruhn Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court oí the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri. Action by the Erye-Bruhn Company against the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
REED, District Judge.
The Frye-Bruhn Company, a Washington corporation (which will be called the “plaintiff”), sued the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Company, an Iowa corporation (which will be called the “defendant”), to recover from it as a common carrier and forwarder of freight and property from Kansas City, Mo., destined to Seattle, Wash., damages because of its refusal to receive from the Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company (which will be called the “M., K. & T. Co.”), at said Kansas City, 21 carloads of cattle, aggregating. 508 head, owned by the plaintiff and shipped by it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Railway Co. v. HeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Newport News & Mississippi Valley Co. v. PaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Potter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hatcher v. Northwestern Nat. Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- International Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Must Hatch Incubator Co. v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1928
- Burshi v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- First Nat. Bank of Casselton v. National City Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.