Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Oakbrook Terrace v. Suburban Bank and Trust Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 24, 2006No. 2-04-0719Published

1DissentJustice Callum

Because I disagree with my colleagues that the City’s ordinance infringes on the administration of the judiciary and thus does not pertain to its local government and affairs and because I find merit in the remainder of the City’s home-rule-powers argument and its takings argument, I respectfully dissent.

I. HOME RULE POWERS

A. Local Government and Affairs

I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that elimination of the remedy of just compensation infringes on the judiciary’s domain. “[T]he mere fact that an ordinance defines notice procedures, the duties of the parties, and the remedies…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. City of Chicago v. RomanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. City of Evanston v. Create, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API