City of Oakbrook Terrace v. Suburban Bank and Trust Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentJustice Callum
Because I disagree with my colleagues that the City’s ordinance infringes on the administration of the judiciary and thus does not pertain to its local government and affairs and because I find merit in the remainder of the City’s home-rule-powers argument and its takings argument, I respectfully dissent.
I. HOME RULE POWERS
A. Local Government and Affairs
I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that elimination of the remedy of just compensation infringes on the judiciary’s domain. “[T]he mere fact that an ordinance defines notice procedures, the duties of the parties, and the remedies…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- City of Chicago v. RomanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- City of Evanston v. Create, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.